Lean Meetings 2: Semper Gumby!

Flexible and Creative MeetingsPoint of Order! I make a motion to rescind Roberts Rules of Order in their entirety and free us from the inflexible, outmoded, ungainly, and utterly dehumanizing parliamentary procedure!

Conversations are contextual. They meander, move in unintended directions, and give way to discovery. For this to happen, flexibility is key. Control, agendas, and procedures impeded conversation, focusing on the structure of the meeting rather than the topics at hand. If you want people to engage in and feel they’ve derived value from your meeting, make them feel respected, not restricted.

“Only those who respect the personality of others can be of real use to them” ~ Albert Schweitzer

The truly “Lean” meeting is democratized. The agenda is replaced with a backlog. Attendees choose both the topics and the order in which they will be discussed. The meeting isn’t confined to previously established topics. Attendees can introduce new topics into the backlog at any time, and the group can prioritize or re-prioritize them on the fly. Quite often, new topics will spontaneously emerge as the conversation evolves. When this happens, it’s perfectly okay for someone to notice that a new topic has entered the flow and to add it to the DOING column.

“Nothing is softer or more flexible than water, yet nothing can resist it” ~ Lao Tzu

Flexibility is strength. Rigid structures topple and collapse in an earthquake, so structural engineers design skyscrapers and bridges that are flexible enough to withstand seismic shock and move without collapsing. Conversation is the same way. Suppose you’re in a meeting about developing new markets, and there’s a set agenda involving direct sales to Asia. Ten minutes in, your affiliate program becomes relevant. While it is certainly germane to the discussion and an easy transition to make, technically it’s not in the meeting’s agenda and so you’re forced to put off discussing it until a future meeting.

In a democratized and lean meeting, the introduction of this new albeit relevant topic to the queue would be seamless, and the conversation would continue.

This acknowledges the natural, unimpeded progression of the conversation and gives participants the opportunity to continue with the original discussion, adapt to the new topic, or table the new topic for a future meeting. The meeting participants have the freedom and the flexibility to discuss and innovate. The meeting and its direction are now creative and interactive.

*Photo by Tonianne

This entry was posted in Expert and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Lean Meetings 2: Semper Gumby!

  1. Don Cox says:

    I’d love to see a post on anti-patterns. And maybe one that covers prerequisites.

    For instance, allowing anyone to say what is under discussion could be a real rabbit hole if you have the right kind of people at the meeting. And you haven’t spent much time establishing some shared context and perspective.

    That particular issue reminds me of Dialog Mapping and IBIS – which were created to help disentangle the complex interthreading of conversation.

    Thanks,
    Don

  2. Pingback: (mt) Media Temple » Weblog » Blog Archive » Iteration of the Lean Meetings Concept

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>